Semi-structured collection of AI observations. Opinions my own, not those of AMD.
LLMs behave in ways that reflect the limitations of their training data. Most obviously, the languages they understand best are those most represented in the dataset used for training. Less clearly but also importantly, LLMs embody the cultural assumptions and biases of their training content. One approach that has been proposed to quantify this is mapping LLMs onto the two dimensions of the Inglehart-Welzel World Cultural Map.
Source: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/
LLMs tend to cluster in a small area of the World Cultural Map, as shown below for OpenAI’s GPT models. The same behaviour is apparent across other frontier-class models.

Source: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.14096
World Values Survey
The organization that publishes and updates the Inglehart–Welzel Cultural Map
Cultural Bias and Cultural Alignment of Large Language Models
Perhaps the most-cited publication examining how LLMs map onto the Inglehart-Welzel World Cultural Map. Findings limited to OpenAI models.
The Value Atlas of AI: Mapping World Human Values in Large Language Models
A more recent paper which includes a wider set of LLMs from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI and several others.